首页> 外文OA文献 >GRACE risk score: sex-based validity of in-hospital mortality prediction in Canadian patients with acute coronary syndrome
【2h】

GRACE risk score: sex-based validity of in-hospital mortality prediction in Canadian patients with acute coronary syndrome

机译:GRaCE风险评分:加拿大急性冠脉综合征患者的院内死亡率预测的性别有效性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Although there are sex differences in management and outcome of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), sex is not a component of Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score (RS) for in-hospital mortality prediction. We sought to determine the prognostic utility of GRACE RS in men and women, and whether its predictive accuracy would be augmented through sex-based modification of its components. Methods: Canadian men and women enrolled in GRACE and Canadian Registry of Acute Coronary Events were stratified as ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). GRACE RS was calculated as per original model. Discrimination and calibration were evaluated using the c-statistic and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression was undertaken to assess potential interactions of sex with GRACE RS components. Results: For the overall cohort (n = 14,422), unadjusted in-hospital mortality rate was higher in women than men (4.5% vs. 3.0%, p < 0.001). Overall, GRACE RS c-statistic and goodness-of-fit test p-value were 0.85 (95%CI 0.83–0.87) and 0.11, respectively. While the RS had excellent discrimination for all subgroups (c-statistics > 0.80), discrimination was lower for women compared to men with STEMI [0.80 (0.75–0.84) vs. 0.86 (0.82–0.89), respectively, p < 0.05]. The goodness-of-fit test showed good calibration for women (p = 0.86), but suboptimal for men (p = 0.031). No significant interaction was evident between sex and RS components (all p > 0.25). Conclusions: The GRACE RS is a valid predictor of in-hospital mortality for both men and women with ACS. The lack of interaction between sex and RS components suggests that sex-based modification is not required.
机译:背景:尽管急性冠脉综合征(ACS)的管理和结局存在性别差异,但性别并不是用于院内死亡率预测的全球急性冠脉事件(GRACE)风险评分(RS)的组成部分。我们试图确定GRACE RS在男性和女性中的预后效用,以及通过对其成分进行基于性别的修饰是否可以提高其预测准确性。方法:将GRACE和加拿大急性冠脉事件登记处的加拿大男性和女性分层为ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)或非ST段抬高型心肌梗塞(NSTE-ACS)。 GRACE RS是根据原始模型计算的。分别使用c统计量和Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验评估判别和校准。进行多变量logistic回归以评估性别与GRACE RS组件之间的潜在相互作用。结果:对于整个队列(n = 14,422),女性未经调整的住院死亡率高于男性(4.5%比3.0%,p <0.001)。总体而言,GRACE RS c统计量和拟合优度检验p值分别为0.85(95%CI 0.83–0.87)和0.11。尽管RS在所有亚组中均具有出色的辨别力(c统计量> 0.80),但与STEMI的男性相比,女性的辨别率较低[分别为0.80(0.75-0.84)和0.86(0.82-0.89),p <0.05]。拟合优度检验显示出对女性的良好校准(p = 0.86),但对于男性而言则次优(p = 0.031)。性别和RS成分之间没有明显的相互作用(所有p> 0.25)。结论:GRACE RS是患有ACS的男性和女性的院内死亡率的有效预测指标。性别与RS成分之间缺乏相互作用,这表明不需要基于性别的修饰。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号